Webinar Date: October 18, 2017
Series: Structural Pest Control
Activity Type: Matching Exercises
Exercises: 3
Total Pairs: 26 (8 + 10 + 8)


CHAIN OF CUSTODY

  • Source documents: Corrected SRT (GTBOP_Transcript_2017-10-18_InsecticideMOA.srt) + Archive Package (GTBOP_Archive_Summary_2017-10-18_InsecticideMOA.md)
  • All terms, definitions, and relationships derived exclusively from presentation content

Matching Exercise 1: Insecticide Classes and Their Target Sites

Timestamp Reference: 28:40 – 39:05 (primary coverage area)
Type: Product-Target Site Matching

Instructions: Match each insecticide class in Column A with the target site it affects in Column B. Note: Column B contains two extra items.

#Column AColumn B
1Pyrethroidsa) Chloride channels
2Fipronil (phenylpyrazole)b) Acetylcholine receptor
3Nicotinoidsc) Muscular calcium channels
4Organophosphates and carbamatesd) Axonal sodium channels
5Diamides (chlorantraniliprole)e) Acetylcholinesterase enzyme
6Indoxacarb (oxadiazine)f) Mitochondria (energy production)
7Abamectin (avermectin)g) Chitin synthesis enzymes
8Chitin synthesis inhibitorsh) Glutamate-gated chloride channels
i) Juvenile hormone receptors
j) Axonal sodium channels (blockage)

Answer Key:
1 → d, 2 → a, 3 → b, 4 → e, 5 → c, 6 → j, 7 → h, 8 → g

Notes:

  • Items 1 and 6 both target sodium channels but through opposite mechanisms (stimulation vs. blockage), which is why they map to separate entries (d and j). This distinction is a key teaching point from the presentation.
  • Distractors: (f) mitochondria and (i) juvenile hormone receptors are legitimate target sites discussed elsewhere in the presentation but do not match the classes listed in Column A.

Source in transcript: Blocks 301–343 (target site roadmap), 346–362 (sodium channels), 363–387 (chloride channels), 388–407 (acetylcholine), 429–444 (diamides), 466–482 (IGRs)


Matching Exercise 2: Insecticide Mode of Action Effects

Timestamp Reference: 17:51 – 47:00 (spans full classification section)
Type: Product-Effect Matching

Instructions: Match each insecticide or insecticide class in Column A with the physiological effect it produces in insects, as described by Dr. Scharf, in Column B. Note: Column B contains two extra items.

#Column AColumn B
1Pyrethroids / pyrethrinsa) Blocks chloride channels, causing nervous system excitation
2Fipronilb) Stimulates muscular calcium channels, causing contraction followed by energy depletion and paralysis
3Indoxacarbc) Stimulates sodium channels, causing rapid knockdown and excitation
4Organophosphatesd) Inhibits chitin synthesis enzyme, causing death during molting
5Diamidese) Blocks sodium channels, causing paralysis (“on switch stuck in off position”)
6Juvenile hormone analogs (pyriproxyfen)f) Inhibits acetylcholinesterase, causing excitation from neurotransmitter buildup
7Chitin synthesis inhibitorsg) Mimics juvenile hormone, causing cuticle deformation and extra juvenile stages
8Abamectinh) Stimulates chloride channels, causing inhibition and paralysis
9Silica gel / diatomaceous earthi) Abrades waxy cuticle layer, causing water loss and dehydration
10Nicotinoid-pyrethroid combinationsj) Stimulates acetylcholine receptors and sodium channels simultaneously (potentiation)
k) Disrupts mitochondrial respiration, depleting cellular energy
l) Blocks acetylcholine receptors, preventing nerve signal transmission

Answer Key:
1 → c, 2 → a, 3 → e, 4 → f, 5 → b, 6 → g, 7 → d, 8 → h, 9 → i, 10 → j

Notes:

  • This exercise tests understanding of both the target site AND the specific mode of action (stimulation vs. blockage vs. inhibition) — the core teaching framework of the presentation.
  • Distractors: (k) mitochondrial disruption is discussed for products like hydramethylnon but is not paired with any Column A item; (l) is a plausible-sounding but incorrect mechanism not described in the presentation.

Source in transcript: Blocks 184–205 (four modes of action), 346–362 (sodium channels), 363–387 (chloride channels), 388–407 (acetylcholine), 408–420 (combinations), 429–444 (diamides), 466–482 (IGRs), 499–511 (dusts)


Matching Exercise 3: Practical Factors Affecting Insecticide Performance

Timestamp Reference: 48:15 – 56:30 (practical factors section)
Type: Timing-Practice Matching

Instructions: Match each practical factor or scenario in Column A with the correct explanation or outcome described by Dr. Scharf in Column B. Note: Column B contains two extra items.

#Column AColumn B
1Excess food in a cockroach accounta) Can pass insecticide through two digestive tracts and still affect a third individual
2Dirt and grease on treated surfacesb) Physically bind and tie up insecticides, reducing their effectiveness
3Cockroach secondary/tertiary killc) Enables slow-acting insecticides to spread through food sharing and grooming
4Trophallaxis and allogrooming in social insectsd) Competes directly with bait placements, reducing consumption by target pests
5Flea larvae exposed through adult flea fecese) Causes the insecticide’s active ingredient to degrade faster in the environment
6UV light exposure on raw insecticidesf) Larvae consume insecticide-laden feces of treated adults as a nutritional source
7Formulations (inerts, stabilizers, attractants)g) Enhance stability, extend longevity, improve safety, and keep active ingredients dissolved in water
8Product rotation every 3 months or monthlyh) Helps manage resistance by alternating between different modes of action
i) Increases the LD50 of the product, making it less toxic to target pests
j) Converts neurotoxic insecticides into non-repellent formulations

Answer Key:
1 → d, 2 → b, 3 → a, 4 → c, 5 → f, 6 → e, 7 → g, 8 → h

Notes:

  • This exercise bridges the gap between toxicology and practice — the section of the presentation Scharf described as “where toxicology interfaces with practice.”
  • Distractors: (i) is plausible-sounding but reverses the relationship (formulations don’t increase LD50 for targets); (j) is a fabricated mechanism not described in the presentation.

Source in transcript: Blocks 515–547 (stability and formulations), 548–567 (pest behavior), 568–585 (sanitation), 586–611 (resistance management)


Moodle Activity Verification

  • All terms, definitions, and relationships derived from presentation content
  • Timestamp references verified against corrected SRT
  • No external knowledge required to answer correctly
  • Matching items unambiguous based on presentation content
  • 1–2 plausible distractors included per exercise to prevent elimination guessing
  • Answer keys unambiguously correct per speaker’s content
  • Exercises cover early (target sites), middle (modes of action and effects), and late (practical factors) presentation content